recent years, the state’s tax revenues continued to grow rapidly and become the main reason for promoting the growth of fiscal revenue. Faster revenue growth means that China’s macro tax burden is too high? Experts pointed out that China’s macro tax burden should be rational view of the level. From the international point of view, both the full diameter of government revenue or GDP, the proportion of available financial resources, the proportion of our country are obviously low.
IMF data, China’s macro tax burden lower than the industrialized and developing countries. Published under the IMF \industrialized countries, the average was 45.3%, 29 developing countries, the average level of 35.5%.
from China’s conditions, according to all caliber of government revenue Jisuan, China’s macro tax burden in 2007, 27.6% than the world average level of 12.3 percentage points lower, Bu Jin lower than the average for industrialized countries, but also lower than the developing countries average.
Jia Kang pointed out that from the available financial resources, of our co-ordinate arrangements for public revenue is significantly lower proportion of total GDP. Under the current management system, China’s financial revenue, only the public revenue can be used to protect and improve the overall livelihood of the people, and other public expenditures. China 2007 GDP, the proportion of public revenue was 19.9%, 19.5% in 2008, 2009, 20.4%, significantly lower than the foreign level.
for the community is concerned with income distribution, the Aim of the view that one should see the recent years, with economic development and revenue growth, the income level of people with significant growth in general, but on the other hand should be noted that income growth is still relatively low in fact. The Government should speed up the income distribution system reform, and constantly improve income distribution in the proportion of national income. To deepen fiscal and tax reform, fiscal policy into full play the role of regulating the distribution of income, especially for low-income groups, income increase.
ensure that more funds be used to protect and improve people’s livelihood
experts for rapid revenue growth, on the one hand to see our current revenue and expenditure problems remain outstanding, the proportion of GDP, public finances, revenue lower the facts, we must also realize that should be further adjusted and optimize the expenditure structure, and strengthen the financial and scientific, meticulous management, improve transparency in the use of funds to ensure that more financial resources to better benefit the people’s livelihood.
\ability to adjust and optimize the financial expenditure structure, increase for the \effectively \
just published the 2009 report of the central accounts show that in 2009 the central government for the \employment, affordable housing, livelihood and culture, the total expenditure of 742.256 billion yuan, an increase of 31.7%. If you include environmental protection and transportation expenses such as people’s livelihood, the central government actually used at much higher investment in the people’s livelihood.
Jia Kang pointed out that with the improvement of overall national strength and economic development, the scale of growth in fiscal revenue significantly. The surface, the central government took the bulk of revenue, but in reality the central government except a small part of the expenditure for the central level, the more used to the local tax return and transfer payments,christian louboutin sandals for sale, balance of financial differences between regions, focusing on the central and western regions to improve people’s livelihood .
data show that in 2009 the central level revenue in the national fiscal revenue was 52.4%,christian louboutin wedding shoes, but the central level expenditures in the national fiscal expenditure accounts for only 20.1%. Central and local tax rebates and transfer payments of 238.9 billion yuan from 1994 to 2009 of 2.8621 trillion yuan.
Jia Kang believes that the next step in optimizing the structure of fiscal expenditure should also strengthen supervision of financial resources, to ensure that funds used to improve the livelihood of the people come true. (Han Jie, Rosa)
- _1745China’s fiscal revenue will exceed 8 trillion yuan after the country how rich people rich? -
the first 5 months of this year, China’s fiscal revenue more than 3.5 trillion yuan, compared with the same period last year the growth rate reached 30.8%. Experts predict that if nothing else, to the end of this year China’s fiscal revenue will be more than 8 trillion yuan.
China from 2002 revenue of less than 2 trillion yuan, to the threshold of \The Wealth of Nations \
the same time, the face of increasing total expenditure plate, the community are increasingly concerned about how to spend funds were more effective, more transparent? To this end, the reporter interviewed the experts.
revenue over eight trillion yuan mean?
\
This year, our revenue has remained over 20% growth rate is relatively high. Experts point out that this was mainly driven by economic recovery in tax revenue to the good growth, particularly low base last year and other factors, is a form of restorative growth, actual growth is not high.
data show the first 5 months of this year’s national fiscal revenue over the same period in 2008, an increase of 22% (of which the central level income up 14%), converted to a two-year average annual growth of 10.5% (of which the central level average annual revenue growth of 6.8%). With the monthly increase in May over the previous 4 months fell 13.6 percent, is expected to post a few months, due to gradually raise the revenue base last year, revenue growth will come down month by month, year revenue growth will show a \After the low \
for reports that China’s fiscal revenue is a world in the second place, Jia Kang, director of the Ministry of Finance Finance Division that year, China’s fiscal revenue will be more than 8 trillion yuan, which is a absolute indicator. As the countries in which different stages of development, fiscal and taxation system and statistics are different caliber, simply not meaningful to compare the scale of fiscal revenue. He pointed out that in an international context to measure the level of a country’s fiscal revenue, more critical is to look at the level of per capita revenue and revenue share of GDP, such as the relative number of indicators.
Jia Kang pointed out that although China’s fiscal revenue may be more than 8 trillion yuan, but China’s per capita income levels are still 100 other than the financial. In particular, to see, although our revenue growth faster, but because China’s population, weak economic foundation, \
also pointed out the Aim, the state increased financial strength, which in itself is not a bad thing. But the measure of financial strength, should dilute the absolute number of indicators, focusing on relatively few targets. Financial indicators such as the relative per capita, China still growing financial strength.
rational view of China’s macro tax burden level

Recent Comments